When Paradigms Shift
I was in class this week, learning about family paradigms. To be honest, I was a little bored, but as I've thought about what I learned, I've seen some amazing parallels to what I've been observing about life.
I
never knew there were so many ways to define a family until I took this class.
There are four “paradigms” that families typically fall under: the closed family, the rAndom family, the open family, and the synchronous family. Each family is characterized differently
based on their attitude toward rules and how those rules come into being.
Here’s a brief overview:
The Closed Family. This family is defined by tradition. They
love rules from a distinct authority figure and hate anything new from outside
influences. They may not be the most welcoming and will probably not take
change well. Think ‘The Croods’.
The Random Family. Far away from a closed family, the random
family is defined by individualism. They are go-with-the-flow and have no
definite authority. They love free expression, but they will most likely be
prone to permissive parenting and lend to low self-control.
The Open Family. They’re open about everything. This family
craves negotiation and readily adapts to the needs of its members. They plan to
a T and listen to each member’s voice before moving forward. The down side is
that decisions may be like an act of congress – they take forever to decide or
talk around the problem instead of fixing it.
The Synchronous Family. Just like the swimmers, the
synchronous family just gets it. They know what is expected of them and work in
harmony with each other. Though they sound perfect, when conflict arises, they
might very well not know how to solve the problem and thus avoid it.
When I learned about all of these families, I tried placing
families I know under these definitions. I’m coming to see that no family fits
into a box though. I got frustrated with my major and their hate of labels yet
overabundant use of them. Then I realized. We are simply trying to understand.
And we humans really struggle with the abstract. We try to make the unseen
connection between people a study, a theory, something so that we can understand relationships better and talk
about them as a concrete substance. So I’m shifting my own paradigm about my
major. And I’m learning that life is about adaptation and balance. We never
really get the hang of a trial before we have to move on to our next struggle.
But life isn’t about getting everything perfect.
It’s learning to improve.
So if I can do that a million times, I’m getting the
experience I need. I can be content learning about how to adapt, rather than
finding perfection. (Not that perfection is bad, I just don’t think any of us
really understand what it is, which results in us often missing the mark and
beating ourselves up instead of loving who we are and that we are learning.)
Another insight I’ve learned from these paradigms is from
learning that none of these family models are bad. All of them can lend to
successful families and individuals. There is no one right way to heaven, or to
becoming who we want to be. There are a million different decisions in life and
many times we choose between good and good. We can’t beat ourselves up over
this. All roads lead to Rome if we have good intentions and do what we know is right.
I don’t think one family stays the same their whole existence.
I think families change and have elements of all these paradigms. It’s really not about the box, so much as
about pinning something down so you can begin to understand it. So don’t stress if you don’t fit your ideal
box. You are beautiful. Your family is beautiful – and it’s because it’s unique
and yours.
So let’s change paradigms. Let’s stop worrying about
comparing ourselves to the ideal and start enjoying the beauty
of what we have.
Comments
Post a Comment